Case Study

Fed rate cut probability — when macro models diverge from market pricing

Published 2026-03-28
Category
macro
Brier Score
0.090
Edge
0.2%

Problem

Prediction markets priced the March 2026 Fed rate cut at 42%, while EdgeVisor's macro analyst flagged a structural divergence: bond market implied probabilities, Fed funds futures, and employment data all pointed to 60%+.

Signal

The divergence signal triggered when 3 of 4 macro indicators disagreed with the prediction market price by more than 15 points. Smart money wallets showed coordinated buying at the 40-45% level.

Result

The Fed did cut rates. The market price moved from 42% to 85% over 3 weeks as economic data confirmed the trend, with the final resolution at YES.

Lesson

Prediction markets for macro events can lag behind traditional financial instruments by days or weeks. Cross-referencing with bond/futures implied probabilities provides a reliable arbitrage signal when the gap exceeds 15 points.

Related case studies

Next step

Analyze your own market

Paste a Polymarket URL and get EdgeVisor's structured view in seconds.